Site indices

Previous Issue <-> Next Issue

Precedence: bulk
To: rush_mailing_list
Subject: 07/12/91 - The National Midnight Star #286

**   ____     __           ___ ____   ___        ___       **
**    /  /_/ /_     /\  / /__/  /  / /  / /\  / /__/ /     **
**   /  / / /__    /  \/ /  /  /  / /__/ /  \/ /  / /___   **
**                                                         **
**                    __            ___       ____         **
**        /\  /\   / /  \  /\  / / /  _  /__/  /           **
**       /  \/  \ / /___/ /  \/ / /___/ /  /  /            **
**                                                         **
**                  ____ ____  ___  ___                    **
**                 /__    /   /__/ /__/                    **
**                ____/  /   /  / /  \                     **

          The National Midnight Star, Number 286

                   Friday, 12 July 1991
Today's Topics:
     Subjects to interest just about anyone (yaaawn)
                  Re: Philosophy & Rush
Queensryche says, This is a great Rush song. (no kidding)
       record label change and Waaaah Waaaah Waaaah
                    Undeliverable Mail
   Starting bootleg collections (Shawn Lee, take note)
                     Flames & Ball?!
              upcoming albums...  rush stuff
                     time signatures
                 Rush fans in Greenville
                Where's My Thing? Part IV.
      Re: 07/10/91 - The National Midnight Star #284
                        Radio Hype
                 Re: RUSH and philosophy
                       new trilogy?
                Re: philosophical rushians

From: Editor, The National Midnight Star 
Subject: Administrivia

There was no NMS for Thursday, 7/11/91.  You can stop worrying why you
didn't get it.  :-)  Also, there seems to be some problem with Syrinx
and mail - mail daemons keep firing up independently for some unknown
reason... *sigh*  Hopefully it will not affect the mailing list too



Date:         Wed, 10 Jul 91 16:31:09 CDT
From: The Neck Romancer 
Subject:      Subjects to interest just about anyone (yaaawn)

Good day, I forgot a few things in my article concerning similarities between
Rush and Queensryche.  I have remembered but one, and I will also cover a few
other subjects, extending a trend of placing a subject followed by a colon
at the beginning of each paragraph that introduces a new topic within one

RUSH and Queensryche:  Most of us may know that Rush's self-titled debut was
majorly influenced by Led Zeppelin.  After a while, the boyz gradually turned
to each other for inspiration and devoloped a style which is their own.  Just
as Rush sounded much like Zep, Queensryche sounded much like Iron Maiden in
their first song on their self-titled debut (which was an EP).  That song,
entitled "Queen Of The Reich", had that Maiden drive signatured by:
  __________      __________
  |     |--|      |     |--|       nice effects, eh?
  |     |  |      |     |  |       what do you mean "what is it"?
(*)    (* (*    (*)    (* (*

Okay, so they're not the best graphics.  Anyway, it's the eighth note and two
sixteenth note pattern, which does produce a nice driving feel.  The point is
that RUSH and Queensryche both had influences (though Iron Maiden was *not*
one of Queensryche's main influences by any means), and both are now doing
their own thing.  Check out my next posting where Chris DeGarmo and Michael
Wilton (Ryche guitarists) discuss "Show Don't Tell" transcribed from Guitar
For The Practicing Musician magazine.

A Show Of Hands video:  Just a couple of notes--1) In "Force Ten" at one point,
it sounds like Neil's on the ride cymbal, while the screen shows Him on the
hihat.  2) Does anyone else have a static noise toward the end of "Tom Sawyer"?
I have this noise everytime I play the video right before "Exit the warrior..."

You know you're a RUSH fan when:  you are writing new entries into the Mayville
State University alumni book, and for some reason, while turning the page (no
pun intended...really) an address in Montana of a Mr. Prestbo catches your eye.

Article transcriptions for the digest:  I noticed that a lucky someone getting
their wisdom teeth pulled will be submitting some article/interviews from
guitar magazines.  Well, I've been working on one for a few days (I didn't
know that it was this difficult), so please don't do the article from Guitar
World in the March 1990 issue.  I didn't want to have done it for nothing, and
I don't want you to do it for nothing.  I'll be doing a few more unless I get
e-mail from you listees who may think that articles in guitar magazines are not
something with which to clutter the digest.  I'm not sure if non-musicians
would be interested in them, so let me know, damn it.  I'm sorry; I'm a little
emotional today because my spatula told my sister that cows get more precipita-
tion with assistance by Barnaby Fargenheimer.  (you may laugh now)

That's it, but you can look ahead to that posting on Chris and Michael's words
on "Show Don't Tell", and coming soon.....RUSH TRIVIA!  (actually, it's just
one oddball question)

I'll take off.

Craig Rindy     mv012791@ndsuvm1.bitnet
"Don't feed the salmon, they might decide you don't *need* curtains."
"The monkey reads my journal when dead hamsters fill my hamper."


Date: Wed, 10 Jul 91 17:05:00 PDT
From: valid!minion!hawley@uunet.UU.NET (Todd Hawley)
Subject: Re: Philosophy & Rush

Wes makes some good points here:

>How about those of us who (*gasp*) don't consider lyrics important?
>.. I don't comb the lyrics for hidden meaning or deeper symbolism; I just en-
>joy the music...In my opinion, placing music/lyrics under a magnifying
>glass is an exercise in futility.

Here here! As I've said before, I enjoy listening to Rush because of the
superb musicianship, & great lyrics. When I listen to Tom Sawyer, New World Man,
Red Barchetta, etc. my imagination allows me to actually picture a story going
on around the song..I don't spend hours analyzing it (tho you're all welcome
to do that if you desire :-))

-todd hawley		"on Sundays I elude the eye & hop the turbine freight"


Date:         Wed, 10 Jul 91 18:56:48 CDT
From: Optional 
Subject:      Queensryche says, This is a great Rush song. (no kidding)

So here it is, eh?  The transcription of Chris DeGarmo and Michael Wilton's
comments on Rush and "Show Don't Tell".  Taken without, wait
a minute...I *got* permission.  Yeah, that's it.  Actually, I don't need
permission 'cause I'm the ... editor ... yeah, I'm the editor of Guitar For
The Practicing Musician magazine.    OKAY!  I confess.  I'm a pathological
liar, but I just want to be loved; is that so wronG?  (you're not a rabbit,
are you, Harvey)  ENOUGH!!!  On with the article from the August 1991 issue
under the column called "In The Listening Room"--Here's what the Queensryche
guitarists say about "Show Don't Tell".

Chris DeGarmo:  This is a great Rush song.

Michael Wilton:  This has everything.  It starts with a great intro, which
totally puts you in this mood.  Then, all of a sudden you're somewhere else,
which we like.

Chris:  It's got excellent dynamic changes.  The texturing of the instruments
is great.  It's rhythmically exciting and the guitar sounds are just so dy-
namic.  The clear, clean sound of this is amazing.  It's crystal.  It sounds
like a steel harp or something.  From the performance standpoint this is a
great performance.  They sound very inspiring.

Michael:  They're tight.

Chris:  There's great cohesiveness between the band members.  It's obviously
a band cohesion there.  We can relate to it because we are so tight together,
as friends.  We think things through like these guys.  They obviously put a
great deal of passion into their stuff.  It's something you can listen to over
and over.  There's a lot of similarities between Rush and us.  (Transcriber's
note: I told you so. :-)  Rush is a band that has been keen on experimentation.
It's a very growth-oriented and adventuresome bunch of guys.  Just look at
their discography.  They've gone through these amazing transitions throughout
their career, *and* they have a following.  The Rush fans are in it for the
long haul.  They grew with these guys, they changed with the band, they look
forward to the new adventures.

============================End of stolen information.=========================

Okay, like, I hope there's only eight weeks left of our wait for this new
adventure, eh?  I think Chris really captured the mind and heart of Rush
fans, so I believe that he is a pretty big one himself.  I know that Scott
Rockenfeild and Eddie Jackson (drummer and bassist for Queensryche) are big
fans themselves because I read an interview where one of the band members
said that Scott and Eddie are always jamming some Rush tunes before rehearsal.
Anyway, the following is some more from that same article that pertains to
the boyz.

< reinstate information theft mode

(Some discussion was just taking place about a Bachesque Cacophony song.)

Guitar ftPM magazine:  Who writes the best instrumentals?

Michael:  Yes and Rush.

Chris:  "Cinema", from _90125_.

Michael:  Rush did "YYZ".  I'm kind of tired of that classical thing.  It's
great playing.  I would listen to that song, but I probably wouldn't be able
to listen to the whole album, if it's all like that.

Chris:  In a situation like that we're going to commend the performance because
it obviously shows some great dexterity and pretty thorough understanding of
the instrument.  But it's not really my idea of a song.

< end information theft mode

It seems that Queensryche, like some of our favorite bands, also put the song
before the ego (playing fast classical chops and arpeggios).  That's one of the
main things that I like about Rush, that they can write good songs and put the
whole picture as a higher priority than advancing their individual fame.  Hell,
it's one of the main things that I like about Queensryche, too, then, eh?

Never once did these guys slam the songs that they heard for this interview
like I've heard Dave Mustaine do many times.  I respect Dave's playing, but
he's got a bad attitude, and I'm glad that bands like Rush have the integrity
to criticize themselves more than taking cheap shots at more famous people.

I also like that Chris and Michael mentioned Yes.  FYI, if you didn't already
know, Cinema was the projected name for the group which formed Yes for the
_90125_ release.  For some reason, they kept using Yes instead.  I believe
the members were then Jon Anderson, Chris Squire, Trevor Rabin, Tony Kaye,
and Alan White.  I may be wrong...I'm not sure.

That's enough rambling because I think I've gone off on a tangent.
(Or maybe I got off on a cosine.)

Craig Rindy    mv012791@ndsuvm1.bitnet
The Neck Romancer   (it's just a pun, don't take it too seriously)

"The other day I got off on a sine.  It read, '36 days left', refering to the
                                                        new Metallica album."


Date: Tue, 9 Jul 91 12:07:54 BST
Subject: Bootlegs

No flame, but...

Gordon MacKinney  writes:

     ...people should be aware that bootleg recordings take money
     from the artists who earn it...

This is a subject that has been debated to death in other forums
(e.g. etc.), but it is far from clear that *anyone* loses
*any moeny* from bootlegs.  Creative control is indeed lost, and this
is the only aspect of bootlegs I have heard Rush members complain about.
But money? If someone makes a copy of an existing album and sells it, maybe
so, but this is more commonly callled counterfitting (sp).  The key
question is: How many people buy a bootleg *instead* of an official
release?  I think the answer is "very few".  In general, bootlegging
*creates* wealth by producing additional products in a non-saturated
marketplace.  The fan who owns every offical release in multiple
formats, plus the video, plus attends concerts whenever they appear,
is in NO WAY depriving the band of any money if they chose to also
purchase a bootleg recording of a concert.  They may be doing the band
a disservice by listening to unauthorized material (and Rush can be picky
about imperfections in their live performances), and they may
be supporting some dodgy characters who make the bootlegs, but neither
Rush nor their record label lose anything unless the boot is purchased
instead of an official release.  Of course, each of us has only
a finite amount of money to spend on music material, and it may be
that money spent on a boot is not available to buy the latest
Madonna release, but that is another artist on another label.


P.S. Zappa may have a point, as he tends to release huge amount of live
material (thus potentially violating the "non-saturated marketplace" criterion)
but Rush can be quite stingy, esp. with live video.  Many of their
tracks are not available live on any offical release  (e.g. Natural Science).

P.P.S. I do not currently own ANY bootlegs, BTW.

P.P.P.S  It goes without saying that anyone who hears any solid info re: Tour
Dates should post!!!!


Date: Tue, 9 Jul 91 15:31:06 BST
From: (Adrian N Ogden)
Subject: record label change and Waaaah Waaaah Waaaah (Jay Shriver) writes:
>why, after many successful years with Mercury-Polygram records did Rush change
>to Atlantic records? Where they dropped by Mercury-Polygram (not likely) or
>did Atlantic just offer them a better deal? I'm suprised that M-P would let
>a band that has been as successful as Rush move to another label.

The Mercury-Polygram contract had expired with all obligations fulfilled,
so the label had no more hold over them. So they took the oportunity to look
for a better deal. They felt that Mercury hadn't really done a great deal
towards promoting the last few albums because Rush weren't the "latest
thing" that could be massively hyped, they were just something that was
there and always had been. By looking for a new label they'd be working
with people who'd see them in a fresh light and do more for them.

Chris Schiller  writes:
>[ stuff from Phil Kime  deleted ]
>In my day.....we didn't have artificial meat, we didn't have meat at all,
>we just had bones, and we didn't roll them, we gnawed them until our
>teeth fell out.  And if we wanted an interesting but limited concept we just
>puked the whole mess up and ate it again,  AND WE LIKED IT!

"And you try telling the young people of today that... and they won't
believe you!"  :-)

<< Adrian Ogden   _ . _ _   _ . _ _   _ _ . . >>


Date: Wed, 10 Jul 91 22:48:36 edt
From: "Dylan Kaufman" 
Subject: Starting bootleg collections (Shawn Lee, take note)

I was in the same position about 6 months ago of wanting to get some
bootlegs and not having any to trade.... A kind soul was willing to
make copies for me if I would give him tapes and would deal with
picking them up (I met him at his office in Berkeley grad school).  I
would be more than happy to do the same.  I only have three RUSH
concerts at the moment, Permanent Waves 3/16/80 St. Louis, Hemispheres
3rd night Chicago, and Power Windows 1/31/86 Oakland, but I would be
more than happy if you provide tapes and shipping...

I suspect that there are others who will do the same as long they
don't have to pay anything to do it...

Am I right?

-<>Dylan<>-                     MA EMT-M, CA EMT-1A, BEMCo 107
Dylan Kaufman 			Major in Computer Science	Brandeis University, Waltham, MA
------<< Support your local Emergency Medical Services >>-------
"I've got something to say!  It is better to burn out than
to fade away!" - Kurgan


Date: Wed, 10 Jul 91 23:06:19 EDT
From: Todd Fantz 
Subject: Flames & Ball?!

Ok, Well being an Objectivist (and a Rush fan) I just cannot sit around
and let all this 'discussion' go by without comment.

All of this comes from issue #284.

(1) Gregg Jaeger writes that Ayn Rands metaphysics are successfully
argued against yet seems to at least have some admiration for her
ethics. (Nan des ka?) You should know that at least in an Objectivist
system there is no dichotomy between ethics and metaphysics. Ethics are
based on the nature of man otherwise they are to his detriment. You
cannot have it both ways.

(2) DO NOT PUT WORDS IN NEIL PEARTS MOUTH. Do not speculate on another
persons political position i.e. public education, without proof to back
it up. As far as public education goes I will quote Nathanial Branden to
show that you cannot be for public education and be for freedom of man.


		The answer to this question becomes evident if one makes the
question more concrete and specific, as follows: Should the government
be permitted to remove children forcibly from their homes, with or
without the parent's consent, and subject the children to educational
training and procedures of which the parents may or may not approve?
Should citizens have their wealth expropriated to support an educational
system which they may or may not sanction, and to pay for the education
of children who are not their own? To anyone who understands and is
consistently commited to the principle of individual rights, the answer
is clearly: NO"

from: Common Fallacies About Capitalism from Capitalism the Unknown

(3) To Wes Morgan...You are of course entitled to listen to Rush and pay
little attention to the lyrics, but...Neil puts a lot of time into his
writing (understatement) and there are complicated and meaningful themes
that to me are inseparable from the music. I guess what I am trying to
say is that whether you agree with the messages or not I find it
unfortunate that you choose to ignore or pass over what I consider to be
half of the "music" and half of the act of "listening". Just don't bust
others who think the lyrics are just as important.

(4) I can testify to Pete Chestnas collection. Most of you probably
heard it it you were in line at the Greenville (ALTP) concert. He also
apparently,(by rumor of an old roommate) has a copy of their first
single. GMAW

(5) As far as the symbolism of the "three gilded balls" in The
Fountainhead. It seems obvious to me that the phrase means that man at
the present time will basically sell his soul to the highest bidder. In
other words people are willing to compromise everything, that man's mind
should have a "For Sale" sign on it. I also talked to Dr. John Ridpath,
a Objectivist writer and lecturer about the subject, he says that he
knows of no other significance to the three balls. Since Rush is the
last thing I think of when I hear the word compromise I really must
conclude that there is not connection. IMHTTO

Looking back at this posting it looks like one big flame..Oh well.

Flame away.

Todd Fantz


Subject: upcoming albums...  rush stuff
From: (Sean Flanegan)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 91 18:36:02 PDT

  Before I say what is on my mind, I would like to say that this is
newsgroup is just what I have been looking for. I am not into computers
that much,  so this was a big surprise.  Now...  onto the business at hand.

   On earlier posts of TNMS,  people were discussing the possibility of the
band doing another concept song.   Names like Robin Hood and Dune were
brought up.  I don't know about you, but I really don't think that would be
a good idea.  Especially Dune.  If Neil was going to write a song based on
anything it should be something with a little more artistic integrity. I
mean REALLY!!  Why not the star wars trilogy or nightmare on elm street
next....  Next,  about "Roll the Bones"  Wheres my Thing part IV...  If I
remember correctly.. this would mean a series of songs in DECSENDING ordr.
Does this mean that we have at least THREE  more albums on the way????!!!!??
      I sure hope so.
Quick question.....

             On a previous post someone linked HYF with the Challenger
disaster.  I am not convinced that the three balls on the cover represent
the lost astronauts...  but "Mission"  may be sum sort of a tribute( the
band did see the first space shuttle launch ---remember---)

  if you have any more information on this subject   please post!!!

also  I heard in Eric Merola's  The Necromancer...  that the new album would
be a departure from the synthesised sound to more of a Moving Pictures sound
   Post if you know about these subjects

                    "  But if you keep FOLDING it   "
                                      -Nigel Tufnel     " Spinal Tap"
                                                          is it true they
are going on tour?   post if you know



Subject: time signatures
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 91 04:26:49 -0700

Can someone explain to musically illiterate me what the difference between
4/4 time and, say, 13/8 is?  I've heard it mentioned a lot that Rush plays
in all sorts of odd time signatures, but I've never actually figured out
what this means.


P.S. In the Geddy Lee interview, they mention "Apocalypse in 9/8" by Genesis
as being on _Trick_of_the_Tail_, when in actuality it is part of "Supper's
Ready", a 20-minute epic that appears on _Foxtrot_, from when Peter Gabriel
was still with the band.  ICYC.


Date: Thu, 11 Jul 91 10:06:25 -0400
Subject: Rush fans in Greenville

Wow.  I went to shoot pool last night with some friends and not one, but
*two* complete strangers complemented me on my airbrushed Rush t-shirt...
To listen to the student radio station here you'd think students in
Greenville (NC, not SC) had never heard of Rush...
I guess if you're lucky enough you can find Rush fans anywhere...

Anyway, before all the commotion over bootlegs dies down, (this
newsletter is starting to look like the want ads), I'll add a little
something.  I've had experience with bootlegs before I was a Rush fan--
I used to have four Led Zeppelin boots from the Physical Graffiti tour
in L.A., and even the people pushing those boots have ethics...a guy
copied them for me on my own blank tapes for no charge.  I guess big-time
collectors and such will pay good money for mint condition boots, but
I'll just settle for cassette copies...

If you're wondering (probably not but I'll tell you anyway) what
happened to my Zep boots, I lost three of them in a car accident, but
if anyone is interested in a copy of the fourth, you have my address.

--Cam    (this summer, next spring, and the

                                 following fall)           (anytime)


Date: Wed, 10 Jul 91 14:19:00 EST
Subject: Where's My Thing? Part IV.

Where's My Thing?  Part IV.  The gangsters of boats trilogy.

    Now that's an odd title for a song!  If indeed it is an
    instrumental, why Part IV?  Could it be like the Fear trilogy, where
    the songs were released in reverse order?  That would mean at least
    three more albums after Roll the Bones!  But why is the word
    'trilogy' in the title?  A trilogy with four songs?  (The
    'Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy Trilogy' has four books!)

    Maybe it's just the fourth instrumental:
        I) 2112 Oveture
       II) La Villa
      III) YYZ
       IV) Where's my thing?

    Who knows...

    Dave Schmidt


Date: Thu, 11 Jul 91 15:40 EDT
Subject: Re: 07/10/91 - The National Midnight Star #284

Someone asked for these...  Here are the catalog numbers to order with for
Rush albums through BMG.  I joined around the beginning of the year, and this
is all of the ones they have advertised since then:

2112   --   133716
Chronicles  --  209829
A Show of Hands -- 200608
Presto is available, but I don't have the # here...

As for cost:

2112: $8.98
ASOH: $3.98
Chrn: $15.98

Wait for the 1/2 price months, so you only pay $1.99 for ASOH, etc...

If anyone wants to join and get 8 tapes/CDs for the price of one, (plus
shipping and handling), contact me, so that I can get 2 free for getting others
to join :)

P.S.  I am not in any way associated with BMG.

Herschel Gelman


Date: Thu, 11 Jul 91 15:58:28 -0500
From: Mark Shaw 
Subject: Radio Hype

I have noticed that in recent weeks, there has been a marked increase in
the number of RUSH songs played on the radio (at least here in this small
midwestern town).  I have seen this pattern before and I have heard that
it can be attributed to a record company driven hype of a band before the
release of an album.  Obviously, since RUSH is releasing an album shortly,
this must be the cause.

Does anybody out there have more information about this phenomenon?  Am I
correct in assuming that it is record company driven and not something
taken up by the radio stations themselves?  Has anyone else even noticed
this?  Don't get me wrong, though, I like it; but it seems to undermine
the integrity of the effort.  I mean, the radio stations will only play
this certain band when the band has an upcoming album (and the only
reason for that is to increase sales).  Seems kind of cheesy, but then
there is a lot of that in the music industry, I guess.

Anyways, those are my thoughts for the day, eh?



Date:     Thu, 11 Jul 91 16:45 CDT
Subject:  Re: RUSH and philosophy

In TNMS, dtd 07/10/91, Wes Morgan  writes :

>How about those of us who (*gasp*) don't consider lyrics important?
>Philosophy doesn't have anything to do with my appreciation of Rush.
>My first exposure was long ago, when my brother bought Caress of Steel.  I
>listened to about 10 minutes and knew that I had to hear more of the *music*.
>At that point, I didn't even pay attention to the lyrics; the sheer talent
>behind the instruments hooked me.  I've been a musician for 21 years, and
>I listen to several groups whose "philosophy" differs radically from mine.

>Of course, I have paid more attention to Rush lyrics since that time.  I
>don't comb the lyrics for hidden meaning or deeper symbolism; I just en-
>joy the music.  To me, "Red Barchetta" was nothing more than an entertaining
>story of youth.  In my opinion, placing music/lyrics under a magnifying
>glass is an exercise in futility.  Music is *meant* to mean different
>things to different people; each of us view a piece of music in a distinct
>light, colored by our individual experiences and perspective.

Right on, Wes ! I am a reletively new reader of TNMS, and was fairly
surprised to find lyrics and symbolism discussed to a greater extent
than the music.

The thing that got me "hooked" onto RUSH, and keeps me wanting to listen
to them repeatedly is their highly structured and precise music. Each of
them is very obviously an accomplished musician in his own right, and they
seem to have a common musical philosophy binding them together so well
that their music is consistently elegant, almost exemplary in style and

That is not to undermine their lyrics, though. The few songs whose lyrics
I have chanced to analyze do put forth exciting viewpoints : The Trees,
Freewill, Red Barchetta, New world man etc. The point is, the effort
involved in following the complexity of their melodic and rhythmic
patterns is enough to draw my attention away from the words !

Ranjit Jakkli


Subject: new trilogy?
From: (Sean Flanegan)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 91 22:47:27 PDT

   Just a quick observation about the new album.  On the song "Where's My
Thing" part IV...   it was said earlier that this was part of a trilogy. How
can a trilogy have a ............PART  4.............

just a thought...

   I am also very interested in getting Neil's Sound Supplement  drum solo
does any one have it?  I believe that it was called " Pieces of Eight "

            I  have  THIRD ROW SEATS FOR    Y E S      AT SHORLINE.

 just thought that I would make you guys jealous.



From: Francesco Marcolla 
Subject: Re: philosophical rushians
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 91 9:41:17 METDST

Gregg Jaeger wrote:

> [deleted stuff] The truth be known, not very many professional
> philosophers think Ayn Rand to be of much consequence -- mainly
> because her metaphysics, the `rough going' for any philosophy, can
> be argued against quite succesfully and is not of a nature which
> provides insight by being wrong in an _interesting_ way (it is often
> said that it is better to be dead wrong in an enlightening way than
> to have views with plausibility but little subtlety). Her ethics are
> oft-discussed in introductory courses but usually as a `straw man,' [etc.]

I must admit that I am confused here. If AR's metaphysics (and consequently
her epistemology) is weak, then it would mean that her ethical/political
phylosophical system has no validity whatsoever, since you cannot build a
skyscraper upon rotten foundations (and I just cannot accept the idea that
AR elaborated Objectivist ethics BEFORE methaphysics). That sounds strange,
since I consider her ph. to be one of the soundest and most fascinating
accomplishments of human thought in our century (in the humanities, at least).
So, how can it be that she reached such a result starting from wrong bases?
Perhaps by means of that 'divine intuition' she spent her whole life arguing
against? Hmmm....
BTW, I can't help wondering who those 'professional philosophers' are and what
precisely their profession is, apart from wasting their time trying to destroy
someone else's work. Philosophy's main task is to look for the truth, not to
demonstrate that no way to reach the truth is available to man. And I do NOT
that the truth is 'a moving target' at all.

Francesco Marcolla


To submit material to The National Midnight Star, send mail to:

For administrative matters (additions, deletions, changes, and 
questions), send mail to:    or

There is now anonymous ftp access available on Syrinx.  The network
address to ftp to is:       or

When you've connected, userid is "anonymous", password is .
Once you've successfully logged on, change directory (cd) to 'rush'.

There is also a mail server available (for those unable or unwilling to
ftp).  For more info, send email with the subject line of HELP to:

These requests are processed nightly.  Use a subject line of MESSAGE to
send a note to the server keeper or to deposit a file into the archive.

The contents of The National Midnight Star are solely the opinions and 
comments of the individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the 
opinions of the authors' management, or the mailing list management.

Copyright The Rush Fans Mailing List, 1991.

Editor, The National Midnight Star
(Rush Fans Mailing List)

End of The National Midnight Star Number 286

Previous Issue <-> Next Issue