Site indices

Previous Issue <-> Next Issue

Precedence: bulk
To: rush_mailing_list
Subject: 08/05/91 - The National Midnight Star #305  ** Special Edition **

**   ____     __           ___ ____   ___        ___       **
**    /  /_/ /_     /\  / /__/  /  / /  / /\  / /__/ /     **
**   /  / / /__    /  \/ /  /  /  / /__/ /  \/ /  / /___   **
**                                                         **
**                    __            ___       ____         **
**        /\  /\   / /  \  /\  / / /  _  /__/  /           **
**       /  \/  \ / /___/ /  \/ / /___/ /  /  /            **
**                                                         **
**                  ____ ____  ___  ___                    **
**                 /__    /   /__/ /__/                    **
**                ____/  /   /  / /  \                     **

          The National Midnight Star, Number 305

                  Monday, 5 August 1991
Today's Topics:
        MD interview with Neil Peart - Jan. 1986

From: stedmant@LONEX.RADC.AF.MIL (Terrance A. Stedman)
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 91 00:30:37 EDT
Subject: MD interview with Neil Peart - Jan. 1986

ROCK: 1980, '81, '82, '83, '84, '85
RECORDED PERFORMANCE: 1981, '82, '83, '85

                                   Neil Peart
                                by Scott K. Fish

[ Reproduced without permission from Modern Drummer magazine Jan. 1986 ]

   Like attracts like.  As I've traveled about the northeastern portion
of the U.S. over the last two years, I've run into Neil Peart fans in the
strangest places.  When I meet people for the first time, they'll usually
ask, "What do you do?" "I'm a writer." "What do you write about?" I answer,
"Many things, but mostly I write about drummers."  These people generally
excuse themselves in short order.
   Neil Peart fans are different.  One evening I was at a lecture, and I
began a conversation with a busboy who told me that he was an aspiring writer.
"What do you write about?" I asked.  "Mostly poetry." "Which poets are your
favorites?" "Well," he said, "I really like Neil Peart.  He writes lyrics
for a group called Rush."
   I could tell you about a handful of such encounters.  One thing is for
sure: Neil Peart has influenced, and continues to influence, a lot of young
people.  Surely he's no stranger to MD readers.  He's been on MD's cover
twice, he's won numerous times in numerous MD Reader's Poll categories,
he's written articles for MD, he is continuously being asked questions in
the Ask A Pro column, and he even gave his drumset away through the magazine!
   This interview was done over the telephone.  Neil had been home in Canada
for a few days after spending several months in England recording the new
Rush album.

SF: Have there been any people, styles, or technological advancements in
the last ten years that caused you to grow, or that changed your style of

NP: Certainly there have been, although it tends to be less one person than
it is the old "passing of the torch," where one drummer develops things
to a certain extent, passes it on to someone, and so on.  The progress of
almost anything is very much like a relay race, but particularly in drumming,
because it's such an interior field, restricted to the people who do it
and to the people who really care about it.  It kind of goes on behind closed
doors, but that advancement is always moving forward.
   In retrospect, the largest advancement over the last ten years is
electronics.  Love it or not, it is a major thing.  The people who lead the
field in that, to my mind, would be Bill Bruford and Terry Bozzio, in different
ways.  The explorations that these guys make work to everyone's advantage.
I don't want to go as uncompromisingly electric as Terry Bozzio has gone,
but at the same time, I can enjoy and appreciate what he is doing, and admire
the courage and technique that it takes to really do it well.  You can listen
to electronic noise and know that it doesn't mean anything, but when you
watch Terry Bozzio play electronic drums, it is exciting and essentially
musical, because he has the technique to back it up.  The same goes for
Bill Bruford, with his more rhythmic, ethnic kinds of explorations.
   Even a non-drummer like Thomas Dolby, for instance, uses a lot of electronic
drums and drum machines, but as a musician, he has a great sense of rhythm.
As a drummer, I find it satisfying to listen to.  Peter Gabriel is another
example of that.  He's not a drummer, but he has a great sense of rhythm--what
rhythm is and what it can do.  Consequently, his music is very influential
to me, even though he uses a number of different drummers and sometimes
just drum machines.  He has the ability to make it all have rhythmic integrity,
which is difficult when you're drawing from ethnic sources the way he is.

SF: Recently, I had a telephone conversation with a good friend.  He's a
well-known drummer who's very much involved and interested in drum electronics.
He had played on the last 11 albums of a major artist.  On the twelfth album,
a drum machine was used instead.  My friend's snare drum sound was processed
onto a digital chip and used on the album.  So he wasn't on the album, didn't
get paid, and yet in a real sense he _was_ on the album soundwise.

NP: There's a real new morality that has to be developed for sampling.
In looking ahead to the next ten years, the biggest thing that will be
happening is the ability and facility to make your own digital chips--sampling
any sound under the sun and having it as part of your drumkit.  This is
something that I'm moving into right now, and I'm sure I'm not the only
one.  It's so intriguing to have otherwise unattainable sounds.  It's not
going to come even close to replacing my acoustic drums.  My drumset isn't
going to get any smaller or look any different.  But the electronic things
that I use will be used in so many different ways.
   The morality comes into it in just such an instance as you mentioned.
I ran into that during the recording of our new album.  We were looking
for a particular sound, and somebody suggested that we take it off so-and-so's
record.  I said, "No, no, no!"  It's _that person's_ sound.  The work involved
in creating a sound is sometimes comparable to the work involved in coming
up with an idea for a song.  Stealing someone's sound is akin to stealing
someone's song, as far as I'm concerned.  You can't help being _influenced_
by a sound.  You may even try to imitate it, just as you may try to imitate
a song. It's still not the same as out and out copying.  For instance, we
set out to get African sounds out of my drums.  That's not the same as taking
a sample off of someone else's record and making a chip out of it.  It works
both ways.  I wouldn't be happy if it were done to me.  I know what it
sometimes takes to get a good snare drum sound, and the amount of work,
experience, knowledge, and tuning ability that it takes--not to mention
the engineer's ability to place the microphones and put it on tape properly.
There are an awful lot of people's lives literally involved in that process.
For someone to just swipe that off a record rubs me a little wrong.

SF: My friend's reaction to it was a loss of enthusiasm towards drum

NP: Yeah.  Again, it can work both ways.  For example, there is one song
off the new album where we were playing all my Simmons drums with samples.
I rented a whole pile of African drums--some big giant ones covered with
some strange kind of skin--some Indian tabla drums, and all different things.
We went through them all and chose the ones I wanted to make a drumkit out
of.  Two tablas, a talking drum, and a giant African tribal drum became
my four tom-toms.  I was able to play the instruments myself, make the samples
from them, have chips made, and that became my drumset.
   Our producer works in London all the time.  He's become very jaded about
the Simmons sound.  He didn't really want to hear it, so we found other
ways of getting around that.  There were times when I vocalized a little
single-stroke roll, and that's exactly what you hear--my voice doing a
single-stroke roll.  That was exciting--a very natural way of using electronic
drums.  The African drums are really the most primitive kind of drums there are,
and I was using the cutting edge of electronic technology to reproduce them.
When you take that further to where you can have the sound of cars being
crushed, glass breaking, or garbage cans falling over--any one of these
sounds can have the potential of being part of a percussion ensemble.  That's
where it becomes exciting--where it becomes honestly innovative and
exploratory.  Copying off other people's records is incestuous.
   Drum machines have the same potential.  I think they are starting to
become less prevalent on records.  More and more people may be putting things
down with drum machines, but they have real drummers come in and make it
feel good.  Drum machines are for songwriters.  As a songwriting tool, they're
invaluable.  You can't begrudge them.  They help the drummer out by giving
an accurate picture of what the songwriter really wants to hear.  During
the new album, these things came more clearly into focus.
   Rush is a three-piece band where, basically, the other two guys write
the music and I write the lyrics.  A lot of times, when I'm off working
on the words, they're working on the music.  I'm not there to be a rhythmic
part of it, but they can program a drum machine to give me some idea of
how they're thinking.  It becomes a springboard.  I could never play a song
the way a drum machine would, particularly because I'm a hyperactive player.
But I certainly use it as a foundation, and often a very interesting one.
Sometimes it points me in a way that I wouldn't have otherwise explored.
Sometimes they come up with something on the drum machine that sounds
deceptively simple, but it can be a springboard into interesting areas.

SF: You're admired as both drummer and lyricist.  Phil Collins is admired
as singer/songwriter/drummer.  Stewart Copeland has been writing movie
soundtracks in addition to his drumming.  Do you think that this role expansion
by drummers is a healthy sign that we'll see more of in the future.

NP: I would have to think so.  It's difficult to know.  I think that the
ability to organize words is the same mental process as the mathematical
ability to organize beats and subdivide time the way drummers do.  For me,
the transition to words is a natural one.  From the first time I went to
school, I was always in love with language.  I tend to think that drumming
does have a lot in common with words, but the two may not always go together.
   If people are at least thinking of other things--certainly more drummers
would think about singing through Phil Collins' work, or about getting more
into composition and textural works as Steward Copeland has done, or about
writing lyrics.  All of these can contribute so much to a band.  It seems
to me that doing arrangements is the natural area for drummers to move into
first.  That's where I think I started to get a little more adventurous
in music before I ever thought of writing lyrics.  I liked to contribute
arrangement ideas to the band--intros and outros--because they're fundamental
things that a little imagination can help you communicate, and you don't
have to develop your theoretical knowledge.  There's probably a trend now--
maybe you know more about this than me--for drummers to be better educated
harmonically.  They might start on or learn another instrument
contemporaneously with drums, or they learn harmony in school.

SF: In my optimistic moments, I agree with you.  However, I see much evidence
to the contrary, where many young drummers are asking, "What's the least
amount of work I have to do, in order to get the most from my drumming?"
Max Weinberg has a theory that we might be seeing people who strive to master
the drum machine instead of the drumkit.

NP: Drums are such a physical instrument though.  That would already require
a different mentality.  One of the things that I liked about drums from
day one was that you hit them.  I don't think that will change in a lot
of cases.  A kid who gravitates toward the Linn, for instance, would probably
otherwise have been a keyboard player or a computer programmer.  That person's
affinity for drums wouldn't have been the same as mine.  Mine was very much
a physical affinity.  First of all, I very much related to the way that
drums looked.  The first time I ever saw a set of drums, I thought they
were beautiful things.  Second, of course, is that you play them by hitting
them.  It was a physical relationship that I responded to right away.  I
was a lot more interested in that than tinkling a piano, plucking strings,
or blowing into things.
   A person who comes into it with that same kind of approach would maybe
go towards electronic drums.  Electronic drums have a lot of learning
advantages, really.  As the pad surfaces become more perfected, which they
seem to be, there will be no disadvantage in that.  It will give you the
advantage of being able to practice a lot, which I wasn't able to do, because
of the loudness of drums.  That's a limitation in a physical sense, too.
Hopefully, drummers will study both acoustic and electronic drums, and
hopefully things like touch, dynamics, and the subtleties of playing--that
only real drums can ever give you--won't be lost.  It may be that a person
who can afford an inexpensive acoustic drumset will, instead of saving for
another acoustic bass drum and tom-toms, be saving for a supplementary
electronic set.  They will get less and less expensive.  All those types
of machines do.  It will be possible for a person to have a small acoustic
set and a small electronic set, instead of expanding an acoustic set too
quickly, or buying a lot of things for which the person has no use.

SF: There's an aspect of the professional use of electronics that must be
frustrating to young drummers.  Your use of African drums on digital chips
is an example.  It seems that, unless young players have an awful lot of
money, there's no way that they are going to be able to duplicate many of
the sounds they're hearing pro drummers use on today's recordings.

NP: It is true that the drumming of Terry Bozzio and Bill Bruford--especially
the stuff Bill did with King Crimson--is really difficult to reproduce without
some sophisticated equipment.  It's still nothing like the nightmare the
keyboard player faces.  With drums, you can buy a _Clap Trap_ for a couple
of hundred bucks and get some interesting electronic sounds to play with.
What you have to have nowadays to be even _remotely_ on top of the leading
edge in keyboard technology is frightening.  Keyboards are getting smaller
in size, higher in price, and greater in capabilities, which means that
you have to learn so much more.  How many years does it take to learn to
play a piano properly?  Then add the amount of knowledge that you have to
further acquire to understand and explore fully the abilities of electronic
   It's getting like that for drummers, too.  I'm a little daunted by what
I'm having to get into to do what I want to do right now.  I don't have
the kind of mind for which electronic things are immediately crystal clear.
I have to spend a lot of time, sweating over the manuals.  I've taken steps
to acquire the latest Simmons E-Prom system, so I can make my own chips.
I'm really excited by the potential of that.  I wouldn't let myself _not_
do it, but at the same time, I know I'm letting myself in for a lot of
aggravation and headaches.  Beyond the 20 years that I've spent trying to
make myself a reasonably proficient drummer, all of a sudden I feel like
I'm starting in kindergarten again.

SF: Do you have a reaction to the flood of cosmetic drum products we're
seeing now?  In a recent MD article, one drum manufacturer was attributing
the cosmetics to the rise in popularity of video.

NP: I've always been into the visuals of drums.  I've always liked a
good-looking drumset.  Video hasn't changed that for me.  Since it's my
work place, I like to have my drumset neat and looking nice.  It could be
that these cosmetic products are due to what I described, or it could be
due to video.  In many cases, you don't even _see_ a drumset in videos.
They either have a little token snare drum, bass drum, Simmons kit, or no
drummer.  Sometimes a drummer is hitting a piece of wood!

SF: Are today's drums better made than the drums you played ten years ago?

NP: There's no question that they are better.  The standards of quality
have certainly improved.  I don't know if they _sound_ better, and that
has to be the bottom line.

SF: Putting endorsements aside for the moment, is there any drumset you've
owned that you felt was better than any other drumset you've owned?

NP: I couldn't say _that_, but the first good drumset I had certainly meant
more to me than any other could.  That's only natural.  I started out with
a really cheap set of Stewart drums.  When I went up to a set of Rogers,
it was the greatest thing.  How can I describe that?  I don't know how they
would compare soundwise to today's drums.  The sound hasn't gotten worse,
that's for sure.

SF: Moving on to styles and influences, you don't seem to be influenced
much by jazz.

NP: Well, of course, my roots do come from jazz.  I grew up listening to
big band jazz, which my father loved--Glenn Miller, Duke Ellington, Count
Basie, and the great drummers who played with them.  Frank Sinatra and Tony
Bennett always had great musicians, and drummers like Gene Krupa and Kenny
Clare influenced me greatly--such disciplined exuberance.  These days, I
must admit that I like the side of jazz that deals more with the thrust
and organization of rock.  When jazz lacks that, it tends to lack me.  Heavy
Weather by Weather Report was a very influential album for me.  All the
stuff that Bill Bruford did on his three or four solo albums was also really,
really great.
   I have to tell you that I recently got to play on Jeff Berlin's solo
album.  On one track, I got to play together with Steve Smith.  Steve actually
did most of the playing.  I just came in on the choruses for that "thunderous
double-drum effect."  That was a lot of fun and a real exciting challenge.
It was a major milestone for me to walk into a situation like that with
no rehearsal.  All I'd ever heard of the music before was a living-room
demo with a beat box.

SF: Isn't that the first time you've recorded with someone other than Rush?

NP: No.  I did a similar thing with a musician named Ken Ramm in Toronto.
That record was released in Canada.

SF: Who are some drummers who've influenced you, other than the ones you
usually mention?

NP: There certainly have been many, but they're always so hard to pull off
the top of my head.  Simon Phillips, Andy Newmark, and Stewart Copeland
come to mind, as well as Jerry Marotta.  I particularly like the work that
Jerry and Phil Collins have done with Peter Gabriel.  I like ethnic ideas.
I listen to a lot of reggae, and the percussion on modern African music--like
King Sunny Ade--has been very influential to me.  I like Rod Morgenstein
a lot; he's a good player and a lovely guy.  Warren Cann from Ultravox,
Steve Jansen from Japan, and Chris Sharrock from The Icicle Works do some
interesting things.  I'd also like to add Omar Hakim, Peter Erskine, and
Alex Acuna to the list.

SF: Regarding your own playing, some people I've spoken to feel that Rush's
last two albums were more commercial than usual.  Was that on purpose?
Is the new album going to be more progressive?

NP: Well, if we were trying to be commercial, we failed.  It's the continuing
stages of growth as far as we're concerned.  The more we learned about
technique, arrangements, compositions, and all that, the more we got involved
with it, and the less important instrumental panache became.  Once you've
done it, it ceases to be important.  Once you've done a few long instrumentals
in 7/8, 9/8, 21/16 and what have you, there's never any point in redoing
it.  The fact is that we've done it, and it will always be a part of our
music.  There's a nice long workout in 7/8 on the new album, because we've
found a new way to use an idea like that.  On the last album there were
dabblings in odd time, but it's become less important.  That's all.  We
know ourselves that we can do it, and we've explored its possibilities.
   We had to go on to something else, which for us was song structure.
We took our technical ability along with us, and now when we go to arrange
a song, nothing stands in the way of trying any kind of different permutations
or rhythmic shifts.  More and more you look for different ways of achieving
texture, and different ways of using melody and computing song arrangements--
where you place the verses and choruses, what kind of intro you develop,
and how you work the instrumental sections into the pieces of the song.
All of that has gotten really fascinating for us.
   We think that the face of our music is changing from having been progressive
to not being progressive.  For us, we're progressing.  That's all that
progressive music can be, and it's just as difficult for us to think of
and to play.  To us, it's totally satisfying and progressive.  Perhaps from
the view of an outsider who judges only on the superficiality of technique,
it might seem simpler.  Believe me, it's not.

SF: Looking ahead ten years, would you like to take a stab at what you might
be doing, and what other trends and styles of drumming might emerge?

NP: It's tough to play soothsayer.  Electronics moving into the area of
sampling, being able to make your own chips--this is a very important turning
point.  With the miniaturization and availability of these things to the
average learning musician, the trend towards having both acoustic and
electronic drums will grow.  That's very healthy, but it always has to be
good for a drummer to start on real drums.  They have subtleties and tonalities
that I don't think electronics will ever manage to imitate totally.  They
have become a separate thing unto their own.  They've become a percussion
instrument, really, more than a drumset.  The potentiality, especially for
percussion, of having your own drum chips of any sound at the hit of a stick
or the tap of a foot pedal is an enormous growth.  It has to be good.  But
the things I mentioned earlier are all percussion ideas.  I don't think
they're going to add to a fundamental drumset.  They can't replace what
an 8x12 tom-tom sounds like, any more than they can replace what a 24" bass
drum sounds like.  Electronics has really failed in its emulating sense,
but at the same time, it has opened up so many doors toward different things
that are really exciting.
   Improvement in pads will be a very big road in the future.  They definitely
have to get better.  Just about every year, a new design in pads comes out
with better and more lifelike response.  But it's still an enormous gulf
between getting lifelike pads in response and lifelike pads in terms of
sound reproduction.  How many different sounds can a snare drum make?
What an acoustic snare drum can produce is enormous.  But is it possible
to program each of those variables and each of those sound possibilities
electronically?  I think we're a long way off from that, if in fact that
ever becomes possible.

SF: So, you don't see the death of the art of acoustic drumming?

NP: I'll be brave and say no.  All the predecessors dictate the rightness
of that.  The grand piano isn't gone yet.  The acoustic violin isn't gone.
The acoustic guitar is still here, and look at the competition it's had!
I'll take a chance and say that acoustic drums won't be gone either.


To submit material to The National Midnight Star, send mail to:

For administrative matters (additions, deletions, changes, and 
questions), send mail to:    or

There is now anonymous ftp access available on Syrinx.  The network
address to ftp to is:       or

When you've connected, userid is "anonymous", password is <your userid>.
Once you've successfully logged on, change directory (cd) to 'rush'.

There is also a mail server available (for those unable or unwilling to
ftp).  For more info, send email with the subject line of HELP to:

These requests are processed nightly.  Use a subject line of MESSAGE to
send a note to the server keeper or to deposit a file into the archive.

The contents of The National Midnight Star are solely the opinions and 
comments of the individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the 
opinions of the authors' management, or the mailing list management.

Copyright The Rush Fans Mailing List, 1991.

Editor, The National Midnight Star
(Rush Fans Mailing List)

End of The National Midnight Star Number 305

Previous Issue <-> Next Issue